On our comparison wheel today, are two audio companies which come from different origins but yet meet each other in the same price bracket.
"If a whooping 3-year warranty and a plethora of accessories are in your mind, then the RHA MA390 U is the best pick in this price bracket.
But, If you want no further than an earphone with mic then you should go with the Sennheiser CX 275s"
Coming to the design, RHA has taken a subtle route. They have used high-grade aluminium alloys that make the MA390 U sturdy and durable. Attention to detail is very apparent in their signature aircraft-grade construction and their aerophonic design. The new housing is considerably smaller in diameter and a tad bit deeper in terms of length. It thus further reduces any contact with the outer ear, making it feel pretty flush and comfortable.
RHA MA390 U's AEROPHONIC DESIGN VS SENNHEISER'S SECURE-FIT DESIGN
Another aesthetic change is the ditching of the black anodisation on the face of the housing and going for a full silver look. Also, the face is slightly recessed, making it appear slightly dimpled, as opposed to the previous flat design. At a phenomenally affordable price point, one can tell that this is a truly premium product.The RHA MA390 U surely gives you a high-end feel.
In terms of thought to design, RHA deserves applause.This aluminium build assures durability and strength unlike any other earphone under Rs. 2000.
The CX 275s features a simple, lightweight design, with dark, metallic grey earpieces and black, ridged accents. Although the plastic construction does make them feel a little cheap, they’re certainly durable enough. As far as the fit, it feels quite secure—the earpieces are so tiny and glossy, they're almost difficult to put in at first, but once you get a good fit, they stay put.
A big boon is the inline remote of the single-button variety which is universally compatible. However, the cables are very thin and the lack of tangle-resistance is a disappointment.
TANGLE RESISTANT CABLE VS TANGLE PRONE CABLE
The CX 275s packs along with it three pairs of black silicone ear-tips of varying sizes. There's also a small carry case, and a double-pin adapter to use the headset with a laptop or computer. Although touted to have a universal remote, these in-ears may not be compatible with older devicesComing to the warranty, RHA MA390 U offers a 3-year Manufacturer's Warranty where as Sennheiser CX 275s offers a warranty of 1 year.
RICH BASS VS HEAVY BASS
On tracks with serious bass, the CX 275s provides ample boom, that too without distortion, even at high volumes. The CX 275s does manage to maintain a decent balance between lows and highs to some extent.
Sometimes, however, there is a strange mid to high boosting. In specific areas, the highs are so boosted that there is a strange mix of elements that stand out dramatically. The mid-range and the upper mid-range in particular are significantly recessed. While the trebles are sharp. The noise isolation is decent but not great, assuming you can get a decent seal with the 3 different sized silicone eartips.
Certain electronic percussive sounds can seem far too bright, even a bit harsh or tinny. You will find that these in-ears may get muffled in the pursuit of pumpy audio delivery. This makes it great for bass-heavy music like EDM and Hip-Hop, but listen to something with vocals and the CX 275s disappoints. The sound isn’t particularly detailed, either. The soundstage is also not as wide as the MA390 U.
This is not the earphone for audiophiles but for the people who enjoy the added sheen in their music.
If you are looking for a rich bass and premium looks then the RHA MA390 U is a good pick since it provides a rich, detailed sound signature with aesthetic looks. On the other hand, the Sennheiser CX 275s has a heavier bass and is quite durable.
What is going to be your pick? Let us know in the comments section below.
Our top Headphones that come under Rs. 3000. Have a look at the list to help you sort through the choices!