by Nausheen Shaikh March 19, 2016 1 Comment

UK based Chord Electronics is known the world over for its high-end Amps and DACs. The most famous being the 2Qute, Hugo, Hugo TT & Chord Mojo.

What technology goes into making them this brilliant?


WTA Filter:

It is well known that 96 kHz (DVD Audio) recordings sound better than 44.1 kHz (CD) recordings. Most people believe that this is due to the presence of ultrasonic information being audible even though the best human hearing is limited to 20kHz. What is not well known is that 768 kHz recordings sound better than 384 kHz and that the sound quality limit for sampling lies in the MHz region.

768 kHz recordings cannot sound better because of information above 200 kHz is significant - simply because neither can we hear them nor do musical instruments, microphones, amplifiers and loudspeakers function at this range. So if it is not the extra bandwidth that matters, why do higher sampling rates sound superior?

The answer is not the ability to hear inaudible supersonic material, but to experience the timing of transients with increased clarity. It has long been known that the human ear and brain can detect differences in the phase of sound between the ears to the order of microseconds. This timing difference between the ears is used for confining audio in the high frequency range. Since transients can be observed down to microseconds, the recording system needs to be able to resolve timing of one microsecond. A sampling rate of 1 MHz is needed to obtain this!

However, 44.1 kHz sampling can be capable of accurately resolving transients by the use of digital filtering. Digital filtering can go some way towards improving resolution without the need for higher sampling rates.



In order to do this the filters need to have infinite long tap lengths. Currently all reconstruction filters have relatively short tap lengths - the largest commercial device is only about 256 taps. It is due to this short tap length and the filter algorithm employed that generates the transient timing errors. These mistakes turned out to be very audible. Going from 256 taps to 2048 taps gave a massive improvement in sound quality - much smoother, more focused sound quality, with an incredibly wide and accurate sound stage.

The initial experiments used variations on existing filter algorithms. Going from 1024 taps to 2048 taps gave a very big improvement in sound quality, and it was implying that almost infinite tap length filters were needed for the ultimate sound quality. At this stage, a new type of algorithm was developed - the WTA filter. This was designed to minimise transient timing aberrations from the start, thereby reducing the need for extremely long tap lengths. The WTA algorithm was a success - a 256 tap WTA filter sounded better than all other conventional filters, even with 2048 taps. WTA filters still benefit from long tap lengths; there is a large difference going from 256 taps to 1024 taps.

The new Chord products using WTA filters all start with 1024 taps. The filters are implemented in FPGAs (Field Programmable Gate Arrays) using a specially designed 64-bit DSP (Digital Signal Processing) core.


Fourth Generation Pulse Array DAC

Pulse Array as a DAC technology has been universally lauded for its incredible natural sound quality. The fourth generation builds on this accomplishment; it utilizes 64 bit 7th order noise shaping, 2048 times oversampling rates and improved pulse width modulated elements. These refinements give much better measured performance; better detail resolution with a smoother more focused sound quality.


64 Bit DAC and Filter

All filters generate higher output bit data widths - for example 16-bit input multiplied by 16-bit coefficient generates a 32-bit output. All conventional filters truncate the output by throwing away bits - however, this dumping may lose information. By using a 64-bit filter and DAC architecture, there is no chance of spoiling the sound quality. 64-bit architecture becomes a very big advantage when digital volume controls are used as no loss of detail or spoilage is possible.



Digital Receiver Chip

The receiver chip takes the SPDIF or AES/EBU data and generates clocks and data in a form that the filter can accept. The new chip has two major benefits - all digital data extraction and a RAM buffer (a RAM buffer sequentially takes in all the data, re-times, it then sends it out). The all-digital extraction is error tolerant - it can accept multiple edges, which often happens in noisy environments, without generating errors. The RAM buffer allows a jitter free local clock operation without needing to send back a clock signal to the data source.

All of the above innovations are implemented in Xilinx Virtex series FPGA's. These FPGA's offer 200,000 gates per device, and merely updating the EPROM memory chip can easily change the design, thus future proofing is guaranteed.


You can explore Chord Electronics & their products here!

Nausheen Shaikh
Nausheen Shaikh

1 Response

Chandresh Singh
Chandresh Singh

April 04, 2016

You started with “It is well known that 96 kHz (DVD Audio) recordings sound better than 44.1 kHz (CD) recordings” which is the audio resampling rate of the ADC used to capture analog information into digital format. And then you stated about audible frequency range (again for analog information or simply “Sound”) of human ears. Then you said this “768 kHz recordings cannot sound better because of information above 200 kHz is significant – simply because neither can we hear them nor do musical instruments, microphones, amplifiers and loudspeakers function at this range” and I think you got confused with audio resampling rate and frequency of a soung wave and also incresed (typo maybe) the upper limit of audible frequency range of human ears by tem times.
Apoligies if my perception is wrong but, would like to get contacted about it.

Leave a comment

Comments will be approved before showing up.